- Health Insurers Filing for Participation in Kansas and Missouri ExchangesPosted 6 days ago
- The Tomato Paradox of Health Care ReformPosted 18 days ago
- 6 key compliance deadlines for 2013 and beyondPosted 21 days ago
- The wellness path not takenPosted 24 days ago
- Many workers aren’t ready for health care reformPosted 25 days ago
- Top Dem Sees ‘train wreck’ for PPACAPosted 27 days ago
- Health Care Reform Cost Drivers – Next Power U Session April 24thPosted 28 days ago
- Young Adults Should Have Reasonable Plan Options On ExchangesPosted 42 days ago
- 3-year anniversary: Important milestones for PPACAPosted 46 days ago
- The Affordable Care Act Three Years Post-EnactmentPosted 47 days ago
What is the real cost of free women’s health care?
By Marli D. Riggs
http://ebn.benefitnews.com
Although eight new prevention-related health care services for women included in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act are now available at no cost to female patients, many are left wondering about the real price tag.
Tanya Boyd, owner of Sunnyvale, Texas-based Tanya Boyd & Associates, believes the Department of Health and Human Services and the Obama administration should not tout the word “free” when talking about health care coverage. “It is completely misleading,” she says.
Free is more of a fallacy and should be replaced with the more appropriate word “covered,” when talking about health care services covered for women, adds Reid Rasmussen, owner of McKinney, Texas-based Benefit Brainstorm. “While many call these ‘free’ services, there is still a cost that’s being shared by Americans who are buying insurance,” he says.
As of Aug.1, the new rules in the health care law requiring coverage of these services take effect at most health insurance plans’ next renewal date.
The services are expected to cover 47 million women, and the total number of prevention-related health care services for women climbs to 22, rising from 14 that became effective in September 2010, according to the federal government. The eight new prevention-related services are based on recommendations from the Institute of Medicine, which polled independent physicians, nurses, scientists and other experts, as well as evidence-based research, to develop its recommendations.
Non-grandfathered group health plans offering group or individual health insurance coverage must provide coverage for preventive care without any cost-sharing requirements such as copayments, coinsurance or deductibles, as long as services are administered by physicians and other health care professionals who participate in the plan’s network.
Group health plans and issuers that have maintained grandfathered status are not required to cover these preventive services. In addition, certain nonprofit religious organizations, such as churches and schools, are also not required to cover these services.
Boyd claims that the services were already readily available to women who needed and wanted them. “Many women who put health care at the top of their priority list have always had the services done, whether they paid a copay, found a clinic that provided services for free, or paid 100% out of their pocket,” Boyd says. “Now insurance companies are forced to pay for these services, which will be reflected in the premiums we all pay.”
Putting it bluntly, Boyd says: “All of this ‘free’ stuff is going to be very expensive.”







